UFO.Whipnet.org | Aliens | UFO | Photos | Life Magazine UFO Report 1952
UFO.Whipnet.org
Whipnet
Aliens | UFO's | Government Coverup
 
What's New?
Alien Documents

Documents

Alien Documents
UFO Photos

Photos

Photographs of UFO's
 
Alien Races

Races

Race of Aliens
 
Roswell - 1947

Roswell

Roswell Crash
 
Alien Ships

Area 51

Area 51
 
Other Alien Sites

Creation

Alien Creation
 
Creation

Links

Alien Links
 
UFO.Whipnet.org | Aliens | UFO | Photos | Life Magazine UFO Report 1952

 

LIFE Magazine, April 7, 1952
by H. B. Darrach Jr. and Robert Ginna

marilyn monroe, flying saucers, interplanetary

Visitors From Space?

April 28, 1952: Letters to the Editor
Sirs: 
"Have We Visitors from Space?" (LIFE, April 7) is the most comprehensive report I have read on the subject. I was very closely associated with Projects "Twinkle" and "Grudge" at Alamogordo, N. Mexico where I was chief of the technical photographic facility at Holloman Air Force base. I have seen several of these objects myself, and they are everything you say they are as to shape, size and speed. 

Daniel A. McGovern 
Captain, USAF 
Alexandria, Va. 

Sirs: 
I first learned about the green fireballs from Marine Corps night fighter pilots while I was an aviation intelligence officer in Korea. 
Pilots often reported seeing strange bright green objects in the skies, unlike anything they had ever seen before, and moving too fast and regularly to be explained or identified or analyzed by the pilots themselves or the intelligence officers. 

Edward A. Kolar 
Captain, USMCR 
Tenafly, N.J. 

Sirs: 
LIFE has again rendered a distinct service to its readers. The authors' painstaking work in compiling and evaluating known data has made a case for interplanetary space ships which is entirely logical and sensible. 

Donald J. Falvey 
Deep River, Connecticut 

Sirs: 
As observers of the Lubbock lights, we feel the record requires that we point out that the groups of objects shown in the Hart photographs are, in these respects, essentially different from any of the 12 or more groups that we sighted. 
1) All but three of the groups we sighted had no geometric form; those three were smooth arcs, not V-shaped. 
2) Those three could not be conclusively determined to be composed of individual lights, but certainly they were not made up of two distinct rows of alternately spaced lights. 
3) None of our sightings was either bright enough, nor in view long enough (3 seconds) to offer any possibility of being photographed. 
4) Even if the lights we saw had been particularly rich in non visible ultraviolet light, they could not have been photographed without special equipment. 
5) All of our sightings were close to the same speed of 30 degrees per second, at which speed it would be impossible to follow them with a camera accurately enough to obtain an unblurred image. 

W. I. Robinson 
A. G. Oberg 
W. L. Ducker 
E. F. George 
Lubbock, Texas 

  • Air Force experts had considered these objections of Professor Ducker and Doctors Oberg, Robinson and George. But they are still convinced that Hart was able to get exposures of the two groups he saw (4 seconds for each to cross the sky, 1-1/2 minutes apart) and found no reason to repudiate his pictures. -- ED. 
Visitors from space

Sirs: 
Your article overstates the strangeness of the fireballs it describes... 
You imply that the 1951 fireball display in the Southwest was not a meteor shower. We obtained and photographed approximate paths for 11 fireballs reported as falling Oct. 30 to Nov. 9 inclusive. The plot showed that all came from a small area in and near the constellation Taurus. This indicates a shower, perhaps related to the well-known shower whose members are seen falling away from Taurus in October and November. 

C. C. Wylie 
Professor of Astronomy 
University of Iowa 
Iowa City, Iowa 

  • Although there were meteor falls during this period, Dr. La Paz says: "Almost all of the green fireballs observed in the Southwest between December 1948 and December 1951 radiated from the circumpolar region of the sky. They came from points 35 to as much as 105 degrees distant from the Taurid fireball radiant, and therefore obviously were not related to this radiant." -- ED. 
Sirs: 
It is rather chilling to see that our plans for hospitality include interceptions and recover. It would be tragic indeed if the harmless and friendly behavior of these crafts from elsewhere were met with military destruction. Not only would the morals of such a course be a regrettable indication of man's immaturity, but the practical consequences might include drastic reprisals... 

Mason Rose 
Los Angeles, California 

Sirs:  ... The only reason the preponderance of this saucer-fireball-cigar activity is taking place in the American Southwest is that this is the area which has brought itself to interplanetary (or perhaps I should say, intergalaxial) attention. It was done so by virtue of the fact that it was the site used for the original A-bomb experiments... 

Bill Ryan 
San Diego, California 

  • The Air Force, which has attempted to orrelate the frequency and location of saucer reports with the testing of atomic weapons, has found no significant relationships. -- ED.

 

Related:

Flying Triangle sightings on the rise

The Phoenix Lights - 1997

Peterborough, Ontario Triangular UFO Sighting

Page 1

Page 2

Page 3

Page 4

 

 

Vote for this UFO Site

     

Copyright © 2005 Powered by Whipnet.